Market observation
We observe BTC and ETH price movements and public data, separating information available at the time from what was still unknown.
INPUT / DATAMarket research / paper simulation
Futaba studies rule-based signals in BTC and ETH markets. We observe the market, state our assumptions, and examine each decision through backtests and paper trading.
This introduction is public. Access to the research app is limited to approved users.
How we examine a signal
01 / Project
Futaba looks beyond an isolated signal. We examine its inputs, rules, costs, and what happened after the decision.
We observe BTC and ETH price movements and public data, separating information available at the time from what was still unknown.
INPUT / DATAWe define conditions and decision times before comparing candidates. We guard against changing rules after seeing the results.
RULE / DECISIONIn backtests and paper accounts, we consider fees, slippage, and risk assumptions, recording the limits of interpretation alongside performance.
SIMULATION / REVIEW02 / Research areas
No single strategy explains every market condition. Futaba separates time frames and signal types, then records the assumptions and limits of each.
We compare long and short candidates on four-hour historical bars. We also study how target exposure, volatility, and external risk inputs change the decision.
For short-horizon candidates, a signal appearing is different from assuming a trade was possible. We treat risk blocks, waiting, and simulated fills as separate events, with particular attention to costs.
03 / Method
The same number can mean different things depending on the data and assumptions behind it. Futaba records that context too.
Set the comparison and decision criteria in advance.
Identify the period, time standard, missing inputs, and limits of public data.
Examine how fees, slippage, position size, and loss limits change outcomes.
Separately check whether an explanation based on historical data holds at later points in time.
04 / Paper simulation
A promising signal tells only part of the story. We also examine why a trade was skipped, or which assumptions produced a simulated trade. Futaba reviews these steps separately.
Record when predefined market conditions were met and which inputs were available.
Record whether a risk limit or cost condition caused a signal to be delayed or rejected.
Calculate hypothetical entries and exits using proxy prices and assumptions about fees and slippage.
Revisit not only profit and loss, but also missing inputs, market conditions, and the effect of assumptions.
A simulated fill is not an exchange order ID, a partial fill, a cancellation, or real-account profit and loss.
05 / Scope
This is the most important context for reading Futaba's results.
Historical replay and paper accounts let us repeat conditions and compare the consistency and risk of decisions.
Simulations alone cannot establish order-queue position, liquidity, prices during rapid moves, or actual costs. This page is neither investment advice nor a promise of returns.
06 / Questions
A few essentials for understanding the research and the protected app.
This introduction covers rule research, backtests, and paper trading. Simulated records are not real orders or real-account performance.
No. A rule that matched historical data may behave differently later. Results depend on the data period, how candidates were selected, fees, and slippage.
Short-horizon signals can be highly sensitive to fees, slippage, and liquidity. Counting signals that a risk rule would have blocked can distort a performance estimate.
Anyone can read this introduction. The separate Futaba research app is available only to approved users after Cloudflare email authentication.
FUTABA / SANJIVA
Futaba's research is ongoing.